Safety • Governance • Assurance

Responsible intelligence, engineered in by design.

EverSphere’s platform is built for critical environments. We combine layered technical guardrails with independent oversight and full auditability to ensure systems behave safely in the real world.

Read our Safety Charter
Live Black Box Window
Latency < 14ms
Operational 
> independent audit: Lexicon-v11 • findings logged
> robustness check: VectorGrid-v1 adversarial pass
> hash check: kai-v7 configs verified
> route evaluation: /decisions/analyze
> core: milo-v8 • status: evaluation
> escalation path: validated • no activation
See more

Safety Frameworks

Our defence-in-depth approach anticipates, monitors, and responds at every stage of the model lifecycle.

Guardrails

Content policies, domain boundaries, PII controls, tool-use limits and rate-limited actions.

Auditability

Immutable logs, model & data lineage, decision traces, and verifiable rollbacks.

Human Oversight

Dual‑control approvals, escalation paths and operator‑in‑the‑loop for high‑impact actions.

Red Teaming

Continuous adversarial testing with internal teams and external partners; findings drive patches.

Deployment Policy Snapshot
  • Objective & scope documented
  • Human‑in‑the‑loop for high‑impact actions
  • Safe rollback with state restoration
  • Privacy by design & DPIA completed
  • Independent ethics/assurance sign‑off
View Safety Charter

Assurance & Compliance

Each deployment moves through a gated assurance cycle, with evidence captured for audit from concept to decommission.

  1. Pre‑deployment reviews: risk register, safety boundaries, test plans, and measurement criteria.
  2. Sandbox & staged rollouts: progressive exposure, kill‑switches, and shadow‑mode evaluation.
  3. Runtime observability: telemetry, drift monitoring, bias checks, latency SLAs, and anomaly alerts.
  4. Incident management: circuit breakers, automatic rollback, forensics and post‑incident reviews.
  5. Privacy by design: DPIAs, data minimisation, purpose limitation and secure retention.
Compliance Cloud
Audit‑ready governance

Evidence packs include lineage, eval results, bias reports and change logs. We align to recognised frameworks and regulations where applicable.

  • • ISO/IEC 27001 (information security) – operated under an ISMS
  • • SOC 2 Type II – controls for security & availability
  • • NIST AI RMF & OWASP ML/LLM guidance – risk‑based controls
  • • EU AI Act readiness – risk classification & technical documentation
Transparency
Model Cards & Safety Sheets

Intended use, limitations, datasets, evaluation methods and version‑to‑version changes, updated per release.

Governance Architecture

We separate concerns across policy, planning and execution layers. High‑impact actions require dual approval and leave a cryptographically signed trail.

policy-layer     rulesets • domain boundaries • DPIA refs
planning-layer   constraint planner • simulation • rollback plan
execution-layer  tool adapters • rate limits • least‑privilege keys
observability    telemetry • drift • bias • latency • audit logs
Continuous Evaluation

Mixed‑domain tests for safety, robustness, bias and operator latency with reproducible seeds.

Change Management

Version pinning, feature flags, shadow deployments and automatic rollback on policy breach.

Incident Response

24/7 on‑call, playbooks, forensics, and public summaries for material incidents.

EverSphere Safety Charter

The Charter codifies how we build, evaluate and operate intelligent systems. It is reviewed quarterly and whenever a material change is proposed.

  • Clarity of purpose: every deployment has explicit objectives, risks and success measures.
  • Human accountability: operators retain control over high‑impact actions; automation never removes responsibility.
  • Least privilege: access keys, tools and actions are minimised and time‑bound.
  • Transparency: we publish model cards, evaluation methods and assurance summaries for each major release.
  • Right to rollback: any operator can initiate safe rollback when thresholds are breached.
Full Safety Charter
Contact
Safety & Assurance Enquiries

For regulators, partners and customers requiring additional evidence or a bespoke assurance pack.

Contact EverSphere
Responsible Disclosure

If you believe you’ve identified a safety, security or integrity issue in an EverSphere system, please disclose responsibly. We operate a coordinated disclosure process and provide acknowledgement for validated reports.

Report a Vulnerability

Frequently Asked

Yes. Dual‑control approvals are enforced on all high‑impact actions, and human‑in‑the‑loop gates are mandatory for sensitive domains such as defence, healthcare, and finance. Automated rollbacks and safe‑state restores are preconfigured; if anomalies are detected, systems revert without waiting for manual intervention, and a human review is triggered.

We apply privacy by design across the platform: strict data minimisation, automated masking of personally identifiable information (PII), and encryption in transit and at rest. For regulated environments, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) are completed prior to deployment, with outcomes logged for audit. Access is governed by least‑privilege, and telemetry is aggregated to avoid exposing raw user content.

Where licences permit, we release model cards, evaluation reports, and redacted artefacts to support independent verification. We also enable controlled replications with academic and third‑party labs. Security‑sensitive details (e.g., red‑team payloads, proprietary weights) are withheld, but methodology and headline metrics are disclosed to maintain scientific credibility.

The feed exposes system‑level events rather than raw user data. Typical entries include benchmark completions, dataset snapshots, rollout percentages, anomaly flags, audit confirmations, and region deployment statuses. This gives engineers, researchers, and regulators visibility into behaviour and safeguards without surfacing private content.

Updates are streamed continuously from active clusters, but only material events are emitted to this page. Routine background activity is summarised; safety events, rollouts, and compliance checks are timestamped and displayed in near real time. Each record is signed, sequenced, and retained for audit.

Yes. We commission independent audits covering inference logs, policy adherence, and configuration baselines. In parallel, external red‑team exercises and adversarial evaluations are scheduled with defined disclosure windows. Findings are tracked to remediation, and summaries are shared with stakeholders without exposing exploitable detail.

Latest News

Milo v8 Released into Clinical Settings (2025) Deployed Hospital Triage Copilots (2025) Military intelligence platform battle-tested (2025) Optimised multimodal supply chains (2025)

Milestones

2025

Platform moves to select‑partner roll‑out across energy and health, supported by independent assurance and red‑team coverage.

2024

Decision engine hardened with policy‑constrained planning and full audit trails; restricted trials commence with critical‑infrastructure partners.

2023

Milo and Kai complete an extended closed‑box communication study; ShadowIntel undergoes evaluation in live training and operational scenarios.

Let’s build responsibly at planetary scale.

Tell us about your use‑case. Our team will share reference architectures, safety guidelines, and a pilot plan within 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree to our privacy policy.
  • Address
  • 399-405 Oxford Street,
  • Mayfair
  • London
Follow us on: