News 2025

VectorGrid Case Study.

Reducing cross‑border transit delays by 27% without adding fleet capacity.

VectorGrid
Images of client and real-world deployments are contractually confidential.
All visuals are AI-generated for illustrative purposes.

Executive Summary

In 2024–2025, EverSphere piloted VectorGrid, a multimodal logistics optimiser, across high‑volume trade lanes in Europe and Southeast Asia.

By fusing live carrier feeds, customs pre‑clearance signals, weather, port/terminal telemetry and market data into a single predictive control layer, VectorGrid cut cross‑border transit delays by 27% and route‑level fuel burn by up to 14% per leg, without increasing fleet size or staffing.

Gains held through peak season and during two disruption events (port congestion + air corridor restrictions).

Industries Impacted
  • Consumer Electronics
  • Pharma/Vaccines
  • Automotive Tier‑2/3
  • Perishables

Modal mix: sea, air, rail, road (incl. short‑sea and Ro‑Ro).

Geographies: EU-UK, EU-CEE, SG-MY-TH, VN-CN border crossings, ID domestic archipelago links.

Siloed Optimisers

TMS routing, WMS slotting, spreadsheets, exception desks

Traditional Tools

Separate border tech, safety stock, empty miles, low reliability

Cross Border

Brittle schedules, over‑buffering, “capacity hoarding”, customs variability, port dwell, driver hour limits, weather

The Problem

Global supply chains still run on siloed optimisers: TMS routing, WMS slotting, network design in spreadsheets, and reactive exception desks.

The result is brittle schedules, over‑buffering, and “capacity hoarding” to survive shocks. Cross‑border legs are the worst: customs variability, port dwell, driver hour limits, and weather combine into noisy, compounding delays.

Traditional tools treat each mode and border separately, pushing safety stock and empty miles up and service reliability down.

Approach

VectorGrid replaces point optimisations with a unified, predictive control layer that continuously re‑plans at shipment, container, and fleet levels.

Data foundation (live, governed, audit‑ready)
  • Operations:
    AIS (vessel), ADS‑B (aircraft), ELD/telematics (road), terminal gate/yard IoT, GTFS‑like rail timetables, carrier schedules, GHG intensity factors.
  • Trade & compliance:
    EDI (EDIFACT/X12), HS codes, Incoterms, AEO status, sanctions/dual‑use lists, tariff changes, port health advisories, phytosanitary holds.
  • Environment:
    Mesoscale forecasts (ECMWF/NOAA), wave/current models, flood risk, heat stress for reefer equipment.
  • Commercial:
    Spot/contract rate moves, bunker prices, air freight surcharges, currency swings, demand nowcasts (retail sell‑through).
Core Models
  • Graph Neural Network (GNN)
    over a time‑expanded logistics graph (nodes = ports, yards, ICDs, border posts; edges = scheduled services + ad‑hoc legs).
  • Constrained RL / stochastic MPC
    for re‑planning under uncertainty (SLAs, driver hours, cabotage, DG rules, equipment balance, cold‑chain).
  • Causal uplift models
    to decide when to pre‑file customs, split consignments, or swap modes.
  • Uncertainty quantification
    (deep ensembles) drives risk‑adjusted ETAs and capacity reservations.
  • Counterfactual explainability
    per‑decision SHAP + counterfactual “what‑ifs” for human reviewers.
System Design
  • Model Zoo integration:
    • TerraCast → high‑resolution weather & disruption priors.
    • Aegis → checks against critical‑infrastructure advisories & sanctioned entities.
    • Kinetix/AtlasCore → yard/warehouse task orchestration for load build, cross‑dock, and shuttle.
    • ShadowIntel → open‑source/discreet advisories on strikes, border protests, airspace NOTAMs.
  • Human‑in‑the‑loop → network control tower approves high‑impact moves (>5% ETA change, mode switch, customs strategy flip).
  • APIs: drop‑in for SAP TM, Blue Yonder, Oracle OTM, project44, FourKites.
  • Security & compliance: data minimisation, differential privacy on shipment‑level features; SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 aligned. No customer PII required.
Deployment
  • Roll‑out:
    edge collectors at ports/depots (Docker), regionally redundant inference (EU‑West, AP‑Southeast), 99.95% SLO.
  • Integration time:
    6–10 weeks typical (data contracts + pilot lanes), with mirror‑mode shadow testing before go‑live.
  • Governance:
    Dr Abigail Shaw’s Assurance team ran red‑teaming (adversarial inputs, sanction‑evasion edge cases) and bias checks (no systematic diversion favouring one carrier/nation absent objective risk).

Primary Outcomes

-27%
cross‑border transit delays (P90) vs business‑as‑usual
-14%
mean fuel per route (sea −8–10% road −12–18%)
+9–13%
on‑time‑in‑full (OTIF) depending on lane
−22%
demurrage/detention fees in ports with chronic congestion

Secondary Outcomes

-11%
empty repositioning through better container triangulation
-18%
lead‑time variability (std dev)
+38%
more consignments cleared on first submission via dynamic pre‑filing

“Traditional supply chains bought safety with surplus. VectorGrid buys it with foresight.”

Marcus Knox

Methodology

Cluster‑randomised A/B at lane level; pre‑specified KPIs; 3rd‑party auditing of data pipelines; placebo tests against exogenous shocks. Baselines included incumbent OR heuristics and carrier‑native optimisers.

Milestones

2025

Platform moves to select‑partner roll‑out across energy and health, supported by independent assurance and red‑team coverage.

2024

Decision engine hardened with policy‑constrained planning and full audit trails; restricted trials commence with critical‑infrastructure partners.

2023

Milo and Kai complete an extended closed‑box communication study; ShadowIntel undergoes evaluation in live training and operational scenarios.

Let’s build responsibly at planetary scale.

Tell us about your use‑case. Our team will share reference architectures, safety guidelines, and a pilot plan within 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree to our privacy policy.
  • Address
  • 399-405 Oxford Street,
  • Mayfair
  • London
Follow us on: